TJ CURTIS: Hi. This is TJ Curtis. I’m currently watering my school garden at Wellington Elementary in Wellington, Utah. This podcast was recorded at…
SARAH MCCAMMON, HOST:
12:04 p.m. Eastern time on Tuesday, September 3, 2024.
CURTIS: Things may have changed by the time you hear it, but I will still be eagerly awaiting the return of my students for the beginning of the school year, hoping that they’re surprised as I am at how great our garden’s done. Enjoy the show.
(SOUNDBITE OF THE BIGTOP ORCHESTRA’S “TEETER BOARD: FOLIES BERGERE (MARCH AND TWO-STEP)”)
ASHLEY LOPEZ, BYLINE: Oh, that’s so cute.
MCCAMMON: What a cool project, and happy school year.
Hey, there, it’s the NPR POLITICS PODCAST. I’m Sarah McCammon. I cover the campaign.
LOPEZ: I’m Ashley Lopez. I cover voting.
DOMENICO MONTANARO, BYLINE: And I’m Domenico Montanaro, senior political editor and correspondent.
MCCAMMON: Today on the show – how the country’s electorate is changing and what that means as voting gets underway around the country. It’s that time. So let’s start with a group we hear a lot about – white voters without college degrees. Domenico, they’re a key group because they’re just a really big group in this country, right? How have their numbers changed?
MONTANARO: Yeah, they are a big group in the country. In fact, in all of the seven swing states that we’re paying attention to – the three blue-wall states, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan; the four Sunbelt states, North Carolina, Georgia, Arizona and Nevada – they are the largest single group, but they’re on the decline everywhere, which makes the job for Trump and his campaign to turn out these voters a lot more difficult.
MCCAMMON: They’re a key group for Trump, and they’re a shrinking share of the electorate, essentially, right?
MONTANARO: Yeah, they are. And when you look at all the seven states, they’ve gone down a couple points just since 2020. And if you zoom out and go back to, you know, 2008 – you know, take Wisconsin for example – was 66% non-college, white voters. Now, it’s only down to about 58%, 59%. So that’s a big shift. And you’re also seeing an increase in those blue-wall states of white voters with college degrees, which is a group that’s now moved more heavily toward Democrats – a group that had been pretty heavily Republican in years past – and now Trump has really sort of traded out those white, college-educated voters, who tend to vote in higher numbers, for these lower-propensity voters, and that is a big warning sign potentially for his team, especially when their turnout operation is also a big question mark.
MCCAMMON: But one interesting and important thing about this group – the white, non-college voters – these voters are actually quite different depending on where in the country you’re talking about.
MONTANARO: Yeah, that’s absolutely true. I mean, voters without college degrees who are white in the blue-wall states, for example, vote very differently than those same voters in North Carolina and Georgia – the two Southern states that are part of this group of swing states. When you look at the voters in North Carolina and Georgia, they voted something like 78%, 79% for Trump in 2020. When you look at the blue-wall states, they’re only about the high 50s, 60% for Trump, and that really makes a big difference. And that’s something that Kamala Harris is continuing to try and do, which is reduce the margins with some of these heavy Trump groups.
LOPEZ: What I find most interesting about all this is, yes, college-educated voters are more likely to vote, so therefore this is, you know, a net positive for Democrats. But I do think – and I would argue – this does present a sort of optics challenge for Democrats, right? The party has long promoted itself as the party on the side of the working man, so to speak. So it’s not surprising that there is some concern that, you know, non-college white voters – having slipping support there is a problem. That’s why you see so much jockeying for the union vote, for example.
But I think this concentration of college-educated folks in the party is going to present an interesting issue as the party tries to tackle its elitism problem. I think, overall, it is going to be interesting to see if, like, this is a high-turnout election or a low-turnout election because what we’ve seen is – because so many higher-education white voters are concentrated in the Democratic Party, it has been easier for Democrats to overperform in low-turnout, like, special elections. But if this is a high-turnout election, I’m curious to see, like, what this would mean.
MCCAMMON: And Domenico, when it comes to the white voters with college degrees, I think I heard you say they’re becoming higher-propensity voters. What’s happening with that group?
MONTANARO: White college-educated voters are among the highest-propensity voters. About 8 in 10 of them vote in every election, as compared to white voters without college degrees – only about 6 in 10 of them vote in these elections. The Trump folks see that as an opportunity. But in an election like this one, when turnout experts say it’s going to be lower turnout than 2020 because of the lack of mail-in voting everywhere in the same way that it was during the pandemic – that these lower-propensity voters tend to then go on the decline in those lower-turnout elections.
But what we’re seeing is, in the blue-wall states in particular, the white population in those states is more educated than at any other time. You know, whites with degrees are up eight points in Pennsylvania, six points in Wisconsin, five points in Michigan since 2008. In Wisconsin alone, they’re up four points just since 2020. And this really has to do with sort of the reshaping of the Rust Belt, where the jobs are. There was a time, obviously, when people could have jobs in factories, have two cars, own a home, maybe even have a vacation house somewhere. That’s no longer the case, and the younger population knows that they need to get college degrees, and we’re seeing that help increase the college-educated white population in those states, and that’s helping Democrats.
MCCAMMON: So interesting. I mean, how does that translate into messaging from the campaigns and to turnout strategy? I mean, I’m thinking back to 2016, when we heard Trump talk about – you know, I’m for the educated and the not so educated. He clearly knew who some of his constituency was. But what does it look like now?
MONTANARO: Well, I think the fact is, when we’re talking about who these groups are appealing to, with Democrats appealing more to white college-educated voters and Republicans – and Trump specifically – appealing to white voters without college degrees, that means it’s going to be a lot harder work for the Trump campaign to turn out their voters. And generally, now that we’re past Labor Day, this is the time for mobilization. And, you know, the Trump folks have had a real question mark around their turnout operation. The Democrats have way more staffers on the ground. They have more volunteers. They have more offices. You know, of course, Trump bucked those trends in 2016 as well, so we’ll see what happens ’cause he has a very devoted and loyal base.
LOPEZ: I mean, this is also why they’re trying to increase support among groups that Trump has been doing a little better with compared to Republicans in the past, like Latino men and Black men in particular, because, I mean, there’s only so much, electorally, you can draw from with just white non-college-educated voters.
MCCAMMON: I want to talk about that more in just a moment, but first, let’s take a quick break.
And we’re back. And let’s talk more now about Latino voters, another significant and growing group in the electorate but hard to talk about as a single group. What do we know both about their numbers and their voting habits, Domenico?
MONTANARO: Well, obviously, just broadly, Latinos are the most crucial, growing piece of the population that have really become a real political factor, especially in the Southwest – in Arizona and Nevada – where, for example, from 2008 to now, Arizona’s eligible voting population of Latinos went from 19% to 29%, up 10 points – in Nevada, from 13 points to almost 20 points. That’s really, really important because Democrats have obviously done better with Latinos over the past decade than Republicans. And, I mean, that’s really reshaped the political landscape – you know, not just for the presidential election, but for the kinds of senators, for example, that are there. There’s four senators now, between Nevada and Arizona, who are Democrats or caucus with Democrats.
MCCAMMON: Latino voters are such an interesting group because they are such a big and growing group, and there is diversity within the Latino voting bloc. I mean, as you cover this election, what are you watching for among this, again, growing group?
MONTANARO: Well, Latinos are certainly not a monolith, and I identified Arizona and Nevada because it’s more of a similar group together than in a place like Florida, for example, which is far more drawing from South America – more of a Cuban population in South Florida, for example – Venezuela, Puerto Rico – very different than those of Mexican descent mostly in the Southwest and West. So there’s a big difference in the kind of appeal, for example, that Trump was able to make to the voters in South Florida – to be able to say that Democrats are trying to implement communism, for example. That message doesn’t really work as well in the Southwest as it does in Florida.
LOPEZ: Yeah, and I also want to say the sort of inroads that Trump was making with Latino voters in the past couple of cycles does seem to be reverting just a little bit back into the favor of Democrats, with Vice President Harris now as the, you know, Democratic presidential nominee. At first-blush look, like, these are, like, fickle voters, but this is – you know, what’s important to know about Latino voters is a big part of the electorate is really young and new voters in general, so they just don’t have the kind of, like, party loyalty that you would see among particularly white voters and Black voters.
And so I think what – at least what folks have told me who poll Latino voters – is that a lot of, especially Latinas, like, you know, Hispanic women, were sitting out the election because they did not like Biden, and they did not like Trump. And that seems to be changing a little bit now. You know, I think the question is, like, how much of that support and, like, the inroads that Trump was making can he actually hold onto? Because, I think, by and large, he’s angling for Latino men. That’s a place where he sees, like, an opening.
MCCAMMON: Yeah, how does gender come into this, quickly? I mean, we’ve talked before on this podcast about some of the movement among Black and Latino men in Trump’s direction that we were seeing earlier on. Of course, that was before Harris entered the race.
MONTANARO: Yeah, and there’s no real evidence at this point, as far as having seen votes that have taken place, to show this real shift of Latino men or young Black men toward Trump. We’ve seen a little bit in polling. But you have to remember – national polls have very high margins of error when it comes to these subgroups, so a lot of pollsters who poll with bigger groups of Latino men and Black men kind of are urging a little bit of caution on that storyline.
But I will say that there has been a fairly consistent trend of at least young Black men and young Latino men who were, you know, not as enthused about Joe Biden for sure, and that his numbers were lagging. Harris has seemed to do a little bit better – quite considerably, actually. But when I talk to some demographers, like Bill Frey from the Brookings Institution – told me that what’s really important to watch as part of the equation here is white college-educated women for Democrats because they likely offset Trump’s potential advantages with non-college minority men. And I think that that’s really notable, considering the prevalence of abortion rights as an issue and Harris trying to use that to turn people out.
MCCAMMON: OK, we’ve talked a lot about the Southwest. What other groups are you watching in the West, Domenico?
MONTANARO: Well, I think Asian Americans are a sometimes overlooked population. The AAPI population in Nevada, in particular, is almost 10% of the voting population – the eligible voting population – and that’s quite a pretty big deal. I mean, you know, it’s more than almost anywhere else. There’s certainly a large percentage around the Atlanta metro area in Georgia as well that we’ve seen had some degree of sway in the 2020 election. Arizona also – about 5% of the eligible voting population are AAPI voters – so really key in the Sunbelt, which is really diversifying.
MCCAMMON: OK, pivoting over to the Southeast for a second – a couple of states that get a lot of attention because they’re purplish states are Georgia and especially North Carolina. I think we’re hearing more about that this cycle – also two states with significant suburban populations and a lot of diversity. How do demographics of these states factor into the kind of attention they’re getting from the campaigns?
MONTANARO: Well, I think it’s notable because, obviously, we talk about the diversity of the Sunbelt states, and no two states really represent that better than North Carolina and Georgia. You know, the white non-college population is still the largest bloc in both of these states – about a third in both of them. But when you look at Black voters in North Carolina, about 1 in 5 – in Georgia, almost 1 in 3 – so you have significant populations of minorities in those states who have really helped Democrats do better.
Now, Democrats have done better in Georgia overall. Now they have two senators, for example, in Georgia, who are Democrats. That’s because a third of the state are Black voters. In North Carolina, the reason why Kamala Harris seems to be holding up in the polls is because white college-educated voters in North Carolina vote a little bit more for Democrats than those white college-educated voters in Georgia.
LOPEZ: Yeah, I mean, there’s the Research Triangle Park there in the center of the state, with Raleigh, Durham and…
MCCAMMON: Chapel Hill?
LOPEZ: …Chapel Hill. How could I forget? I went to UNC Chapel Hill.
(LAUGHTER)
LOPEZ: And that part of the country has some of the highest concentration of people with higher degrees – the masters, Ph.D.s, stuff like that. So when I lived there, Democrats were winning statewide races, and I think Barack Obama had won the year I was there as well. So, you know, there’s a recent history of that coalition of, like, minority voters, but also these white college-educated voters being sort of, like, a tipping point in a state like that, where it always has very close elections for the most part.
MONTANARO: Well, to give one example in North Carolina – when George W. Bush won in 2000 and 2004, he won Wake County, where Raleigh is. That county now, in 2020, voted for Biden 62-36. So that should show you the kind of growth you’ve seen in the Research Triangle with white college-educated voters, mostly.
MCCAMMON: Yeah, in two decades. OK, we’re going to leave it there for today. I’m Sarah McCammon. I cover the campaign.
LOPEZ: I’m Ashley Lopez. I cover voting.
MONTANARO: And I’m Domenico Montanaro, senior political editor and correspondent.
MCCAMMON: And thank you for listening to the NPR POLITICS PODCAST.
(SOUNDBITE OF THE BIGTOP ORCHESTRA’S “TEETER BOARD: FOLIES BERGERE (MARCH AND TWO-STEP)”)
Copyright © 2024 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.
NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by an NPR contractor. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.