The Department of Education sent a letter Friday with “dear colleagues,” threatening the federal funding of academic institutions that consider race in most aspects of student life.
Letters to all kindergartens, elementary schools, secondary education institutions, and state educational institutions that receive financial assistance from the federal government are thoroughly and thoroughly for fair admissions for the 2023 Supreme Court ruling students. He said he gave a controversial interpretation. v. Harvard, it thwarted positive action.
Instructions to bring out legal challenges are almost certain.
“Therefore, federal laws are subject to the target entity in decisions relating to admission, employment, promotion, compensation, financial aid, scholarships, administrative assistance, discipline, housing, graduation, and all aspects of student, academic and campus. Prohibits the use of race. Life writes Craig Trainer, the deputy director of the civil rights secretary of the department.
This interpretation could open a wide range of challenges for a variety of student organizations, including courses and literature taught in schools, scholarships for non-white students, black fraternity and schoolgirls.
“And race-based decisions remain unacceptable regardless of form. For example, schools can determine or predict the race of students and as a means of supporting or supporting such students, as a means of determining or predicting the race of students. You cannot use essays, writing, participating in extracurricular activities, or other cues,” the letter reads.
The letter also criticized diversity, equity and inclusive efforts known as DEI, saying that “institutions are based on the United States’ ‘systematic and structural racism’ and highly discriminatory policies and practices. “The false premise that it is constructed as a result of this, highlighting the student’s child-leaning.”
The letter states that the department will “take appropriate measures to assess compliance with applicable laws and regulations based on the understanding embodied in this letter.”
