Religious Editor
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d252b/d252b5f70411add235f6337f74f3022c1ab2b3b7" alt="Church of England clergy faces disciplinary action over abuse reports 6 BBC John Smyth QC keeps an eye on during court hearings. He is sitting in a chair and wearing a striped shirt."
The Church of England says it has launched disciplinary procedures against 10 members of the clergy following a review of evidence in the report on prolific abuser John Smith.
Among them facing action are former Archbishop of Canterbury George Carrey and Pastor Andrew Corns.
Smith, who died in 2018, used horrific violence to attack a boy at his Winchester home in the 1970s and 1980s, Makin’s review of his abuse was discovered.
Justin Wellby, who resigned as Archbishop of Canterbury earlier this year due to a scandal, is one of several seniors who have not faced action due to “inadequate evidence” of disciplinary proceedings.
Also, four bishops who are not facing action but are criticized in Makin’s review. The current Bishop of Lincoln Stephen Conway, Bishop of St. Edmunsbury, Bishop Joe Bailey Wells, Ipswich Martin Seeley, Ipswich Martin Seeley, and the Archbishop of Cape Town Tabomaggoba.
Survivors of Smith’s abuse were relieved to the BBC that some were being held “finally finally” to explain their failure, but others were not named He said he was surprised.
The much-anticipated report was released in November and was published in 2018, with more than 120 boys and young men at Smith at Christian camps from the late 1970s, from the late 1970s until his death in South Africa in 2018. It was brutal and terrifying” and detailed the abuse.
That review led to Justin Wellby’s resignation because of what he recognized as his “personal and institutional responsibility.”
The church’s national conservation team subsequently reviewed evidence against nearly 40 other active clergy critics criticized in the report, determining that some of them met the threshold for further action.
Those facing disciplinary proceedings by the Church of England are accused of varying degrees of reporting that they failed to act during the timeline of Smith’s abuse.
The report outlined a 1983 report, “containing sufficient information on abuse indicating the need for action on John Smith,” in which former Archbishop of Canterbury George Carrey informed of the abuse. He said that it was.
Carrie Lord saw it and denied it, telling a review that he didn’t know Smith when he was the principal at Trinity Theology College. Makin said it was “very unlikely” given Smith’s public excellence at the time.
He waived his “judicial permission” in December following the BBC investigations in which the Church of England deals with separate cases of sexual abuse.
Another priest currently facing disciplinary action was Canaan Andrew Cornes, a retired clergyman of Chichester Parish, and was scheduled to be a member of the Crown Nomination Committee, appointing the next archbishop of Canterbury. .
Makin Review said Rev. Cornes was told by Smyth’s victims about the abuse he suffered in 1982. “He said there was no evidence to suggest that Andrew Cornes had taken action to respond, but he suggested he thought the issue was being addressed.”
The Church of England has made it clear that Pastor Cornes would “voluntarily return from the ministry and not join the Crown Nomination Committee until the outcome of this process comes out.”
Here is the complete list of clergy facing disciplinary action:
Bishop Paul Butler Bishop George Karierev Roger Roger Con Con Sueu Sioux Kolmanlev Andrew Cornslev Tim Hasty Smitrev Hugh Palmalev Paul Perkinlev Nick Stotttrev John Ulmer
For the time after the suspicion of failure of action arises, the beginning of each disciplinary process must be approved by the president of the church’s court.
Given the vulnerability of the victims involved, it is understood that they are likely to progress.
The so-called disciplinary process of clergy can lead to those who find themselves guilty of being prohibited from exercising church ministry.
Mark Stibet was groomed and cruelly beaten by Smith after attending the school’s Christian Forum in 1977, and waited for decades for justice.
Stibbe said he was “reassured” that what was identified in the review would be praised as “to explain their failures.”
“I am waiting with fellow Smith survivors with great interest to see if disciplinary measures are in place,” he said.
“The senior clergy who knew the full scope of Smyth’s abuse in 2013 and did not adequately assure that Smyth had justice is surprised that it has not been named on the list released today.” he added.
“Nevertheless, it’s good to know that after all these years, not only is the truth being discovered, but justice is being done.”
Alexander Kubainier, the Church of England’s Conservation Director, said survivors and victims had endured the lifelong effects of Smith’s “terrifying abuse.”
“We have announced the next step in the process of considering both risk and disciplinary processes,” he added.
Smith also worked as a barrister representing moral activist Mary White House, who ran camp for young evangelical Christians.
Reports of his boy’s physical abuse were first revealed in a February 2017 investigation by Channel 4 News.
Smith and his wife Anne were excommunicated from his local church in Cape Town, South Africa the year he died.
Additional Reports by Tom McArthur
BBC Action Line: If you’re affected by this story’s issue, find out which support is available here.