Charlie Javise will depart federal court in New York on August 23, 2023. John Mingkilo/AP hidden caption
Toggle caption
John Mingkilo/AP
NEW YORK – Charlie Javice, the charismatic founder of a startup company who claimed to have revolutionized the way college students apply for financial aid, has been convicted of fraud, one of the $175 million dollars, one of the world’s largest banks.
The ju judge returned the verdict after a five-week trial in federal court in Manhattan. Javice, 32, and her co-defendant, Olivier Amar, face decades of prison potential in a lawsuit that drew comparisons with Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes.
When the verdict was read, Havis looked gross at the defense table. The lawyer placed his hand on Havis’ back. She hone past reporters and didn’t speak when she left court.
Javice was in his mid-twenties when he founded Frank, which had software that promised to simplify the difficult process of filling out a free application of federal student aid, a complex governmental format used by students to apply for university and graduate aid.
The company has been promoted as a way for financially poor students to get help faster and faster in exchange for a fee of hundreds of dollars. Javice regularly appeared in the cable news program to appear on Forbes’ 30 Under 30 list before JPMorgan bought the startup in 2021, to Frank’s profile once.
JPMorgan executives testified that Javice had more than 4 million clients and about 10 million by the end of the year, but it turns out she had only about 300,000 clients, and there’s a list to confirm that her Outsize Slaie is largely fake.
Javice’s lawyer Jose Baez told the ju umpire he knew what JpMorgan was getting from the deal, accusing the bank of creating a fraud allegation due to buyers’ regrets after wasting data received in the deal in the hopes that regulatory changes would attract new young customers.
The defense asked the judge to put the sentence aside, arguing that the evidence was not sufficient to maintain the conviction.
Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein heard next week’s debate and said he would resolve the dispute over whether Havis and Amal must wear ankle monitors while awaiting the July 23rd ruling. Havis’ lawyers alleged that the device would interfere with her new career.
Havis, who lives in Florida, has been free on $2 million bail since his arrest in 2023.
Frank’s main growth and acquisitions directors and virtually second in its ranks Javice and Amar were convicted of all four counts of their charges, including conspiracy, bank fraud and wire fraud claims, respectively, that are punished in prison for up to 30 years.
“Havis and Amar may have thought they could lie and trick their way on huge paydays, but they caught up with them and now they’ve been convicted by fellow ju-deciding judges,” Manhattan US lawyer Matthew Podolski said in a statement.
Javice is probably one of the young tech executives who have gained fame in disruptive or transformative companies, and only saw them fall apart in questions about whether they are engaged in bulging and fraud while dealing with investors.
Havis said she founded Frank shortly after graduating from the Wharton Business School at the University of Pennsylvania, and was motivated by her own frustration as she navigates the financial aid process.
Frank’s supporters included venture capitalist Michael Eisenberg. The company said, similar to online tax preparation software, its offering could help students reduce the pain in the application process while maximizing financial aid.
JPMorgan was interested in some as it could be found on a huge list of satisfied clients. The bank believed these future university graduates could become lifelong bank clients. However, after purchasing the company, JPMorgan said he found evidence that Javice lied about Frank’s success.
Patrick Vovor, Frank’s chief software engineer, testified that Javice asked her to generate synthetic data to support her claim that the company has over 4 million users.
When Vovor asked if it was legal, the prosecutor said Javice and Amar assured him that it was and that they didn’t want to go to the Orange prison jumpsuit. Vovor testified that he refused to help.
“I told them I wouldn’t do anything illegal,” Vovor told the ju deputy.
The defense attorney who tried to dent Vovor’s credibility suggested that Javice resents his unwillingness to date him. He denied it.
Prosecutors said Javice was paying $18,000 to a college friend to create millions of false names, including pedigree information. The results were sent to JPMorgan’s third-party data provider, but testimony showed that the companies were never checked to ensure that people were real.
“Jpmorgan doesn’t tell the truth,” Baez argued. “They knew the numbers.”
