Donald Trump’s rapid fire and controversy movements are greater than the U.S. President violating the Constitution and Federal Law, from banning the citizenship of raw rights to the dismissal of 18 inspectors. Some historians and lawyers say that they have been motivated.
These scholars are explicitly the law, such as frozen $ trillions of $ trillions with federal government expenditures, rejects members of the National Labor Committee (NLRB), and rejects the employment opportunity committee (EEOC). He pointed out other Trump actions that he broke. Senate and several years of conditions remained.
“No doubt, Donald Trump is the most illegal president of the US history in the United States,” he is one of the leading constitutional scholars in Harvard Law School and one of the emeritus professors. Lawrence and tribes said.
The tribe stated that Trump had implemented the “Blitz Creator on Law and Constitution”. The fact that illegal acts have been revealed at the speed of rapidly firing gatling guns make it very difficult for people to concentrate on one of them. It is clearly part of the strategy. “
The tribes said the so -called pause in the federal expenditure ordered by the Trump administration last Monday, “a clear seizure of the exclusive power of the coordinate branch (parliament).”
Before the Trump administration canceled the freezing two days later, some groups said that Trump had violated the Constitution and the 1974 water storage management law. Procedures -Legal experts said they could not play cards.
Irwin Kemensky, Director of the California University Berkeley School Law, was also disappointed that he was in the first few days of Trump’s law.
“The surprising number of execution behavior is clearly violating the constitution and federal law,” said Chemerinsky. “Similarly, we can’t think of ignoring the constitution extensively in the first 10 days of taking office.
“I’m doubtful that the president has done so quickly and very quickly, so it’s true that it will affect many people,” said Chemerinsky. “Federal expenditures will potentially affect tens of millions of people, probably hundreds of millions of people.”
The freezing has caused alarms and chaos nationwide because of medicaid payments, childcare programs, meals for the elderly, housing subsidies, and special ED programs. Matthew Vars, a representative director of the Administration Budget Bureau, stated that it was necessary to freeze to stop the use of federal resources to promote the fairness of Marxist, transgender, green Newdill Social Engineering Policy. 。
The Federal Judge moved quickly to temporarily block the freezing of spending and banning the right to live. Last Tuesday, Lauren Alican, a judge of the Washington DC Federal District Court, paused spending. Faced by the great turmoil and criticism of freezing, the Trump administration canceled it on Wednesday.
On January 23, John Kono, the appointment of Seattle’s federal judge, Ronald Reagan, temporarily blocked Trump’s order to end the citizenship of raw rights. “This is an blatant unconstitutional order,” said COUGHENOUR. “I have difficulty to understand how the bar members clearly states that this is an order of constitution, which simply shakes my heart.”
KAROLINE LEAVITT, a spokeswoman for the White House, has defended the President’s movement to prohibit gorgeous citizenship. She states in Wednesday’s briefing: “We are ready to fight the Supreme Court as needed, because we believe that this is the necessary steps to secure the border of our country and protect our hometown. “
Many legal experts and Democratic members have accused Trump of 18 Inspector Generals, who are independent officials who have been auditing and investigating institutions for waste, fraud, and abuse. These critics pointed out that Trump had failed to give the parliament a prior notice and a specific reasons for firing, along with the Iowa Republican members, Challenge, who is the chairman of the Senate Justice Committee.
A great thinker about what we can do to protect the freedom and basic freedom of citizens in President Trump. From our opinion desk.
Privacy notification: Newsletter may include information about the content provided by a charitable organization, online advertising, and an outside parties. See the Privacy Policy for more information. We use Google Recaptcha to protect our website, Google privacy policy and terms of use.
After the newsletter promotion
Late last Monday, Trump fired two members of NLRB members Gwin Wilcox, EEOC, Charlotte Barrows, and Joseline Samuel. All three of the independent committee were appointed by the Democratic President, leaving several years.
Kate Andrias, a professor of Colombia University’s Constitution and Administrative Law, called their firing “unprecedented illegal”. She states as follows regarding WILLCOX dismissal. NLRB members cannot be fired because the president does not want to register as a board of directors. “
However, Andrias pointed out that the Supreme Court’s conservative majority may dominate these dismissals with Trump’s favor.
“Trump may gain some support from the Supreme Court,” she said, and in the attitude of the “Refreshing Refectivity Law”, the court “refused 90 years of legal precedents and agree with the president. He said that he could dismissing an independent institution.
“Andrew Jackson also has a record that violates the constitution in a way to expand his power in comparison of Trump with the constitution and the Supreme Court sometimes FL. I was, “said Andrias. “But in the present age, it is unprecedented to act like this in order to worsen their power and act in violation of the constitution and federal law.”
Princeton’s historian, Julian Zelizer, also broke the law from time to time -in the Watergate scandal -“I don’t think he tried to overturn part of the constitution. Maybe Trump there. Beat to him.
Zelerizer stated that the freezing of Trump’s expenditure was “efforts to essentially ignore the constitutional power of Congress” and “throwing the water storage law on garbage.”
“I can’t remember another president who tried to throw many of the constitution out of the window,” said Zelerizer.
The tribes have expressed concern that Trump’s actions are weakening the rule of law and the respect of the law.
“We must focus on the fact that this total is larger than the parts. If you violate the constitution and repeat the parliamentary actions, not only the fabric generated by each violation will be created. I will shorten the whole, “said the tribe. “It’s just the beginning of this administration. If people normalize this law violation instead of pushing them back, most of us will recover the government’s system that grew up assuming that it is in place. It will be as difficult as ever.
