Apple CEO Tim Cook and football player Odell Beckham Jr. may not be the typical source of fashion news, but last week their outfits were at the heart of internet debate.
It began when they showed up at a New Orleans restaurant dressed dramatically differently. Billionaire Cook wore a shirt with modest pants and an apple watch, while Beckham Jr. wore a flashy watch that retails for $490,000.
It is important to note that Cook’s net worth is 60 times greater than Beckham Jr.’s net worth.
Internet commentators quickly pinned this difference as a billionaire fashion. This has become more modest and modest in the need to showcase the wealthy people compared to billionaires fashion.
Of course, for those of us who are confused about paying for the laundry, the difference between Beckham Jr. and Cook’s net worth probably seems minor. But the debate about whether more expensive clothes really equal the balance of a bigger bank is far beyond these two celebrities.
Today we are sports famous luxury brand names It can actually be revealed Your – breathtaking – middle to middle class status.
why?
As many internet commentators and columnists have pointed out, billionaires are extremely wealthy and don’t need to prove it to the rest of the world through Louis Vuitton bags and $500,000 Richard Mill Watch. Their money sits quietly on the coast of their private island in the form of yachts.
Instead, people are just reaching the level of financial security needed to buy designer brands flocking to buy gorgeous items.
You may be wondering why this is all important when you can I barely can’t afford to buy eggs – Needless to say, Maison Margiela Tabis is on your Pinterest board.
Well, the fact that famous and gorgeous names are no longer associated with 1% vision may be the key to unlocking the middle class from the designer brand clutches. This is a good thing. Because in many cases these companies sell false promises of privilege that ultimately harms the environment.
Let’s start with the manufactured exclusivity of luxury brands.
Recent trends reveal that designer companies are actually targeting middle class consumers Recognition of wealth.
So, while Fancy Pants McGee, with his trust fund, might be featured in an ad for Versace, for example, he probably doesn’t actually walk to the store. Rather, it’s Joe Schmoe who wants to raise the tax range and get to know about his colleagues.
Brands like Burberry and Cartier are known to maintain this image of exclusivity Destroys excessive supply At the end of the sales season, their products seem rare and in demand. It is also a way to keep prices higher, rather than lowering the cost of extra items to increase demand and sell.
As the world awakens to the presence of customers of this fictional luxury brand, which belongs to the top 1%, these companies are also gaining economic hits. Stock prices such as LVMH, Estée Lauder, Kering and Burberry fell sharply last year.
This declining popularity provides a great opportunity to question the ethical practices of these companies.
In 2018, there was a gorgeous fashion. Responsible person According to McKinsey, greenhouse gas emissions, or more than 4% of global total. In the realm of labour rights, Armani and Dior were investigated in Italy last year following workers’ reports exploitation.
Given these violations, the shiny image of the wealth of a high-end fashion generation becomes not only mythical, but indeed ugly.
You can also change the definition of luxury goods by wearing the same top 10 brand names before leaving.
Instead of scattering logo-painted wallets, why not spend money at artisan leather bag shops or check out new local businesses? This shift in thinking is even an opportunity to discover intermediate range brands like Polaine, Gunni and Sandro, which have been receiving rave reviews for their innovation and high-end atmosphere.
Finally, rejecting marketing tactics for these brands leaves you with more money to invest in your retirement account. I know you’re probably rolling your eyes right now – after all, you didn’t read this column for dad’s advice – but when that Chanel of the pavement bag you’re looking at is on the “worst of 2025” list, you’ll appreciate me.
When focusing on the false exclusiveness of the designer world, it is important not to shame those who continue to show off their luxury brand logos.
Just because names like Marc Jacobs and Chanel have become synonymous with middle class and nouveau rich fashion doesn’t mean there’s something wrong with being one of those demographics. And there is no denying the significant influence of New York fashion designer Dapperdan’s logo mania.
Instead, we should take advantage of the growing disillusionment with gorgeous fashion to question the brand itself. By doing that, we can reconsider any kind of clothing, or what kind of clothing company actually deserves the legal amount of our money.
Until then, keep your credit card safely hidden in your wallet.
