During an extraordinary hearing on Wednesday, the Justice Department deputy commander demanded that a judge dismiss a corruption charge against Mayor Eric Adams, leading the nation’s biggest city leader – in danger. Freedom and the political future – “I’m not committed. Crime.”
After commissioning for more than an hour, Dale E. Ho, a federal judge in Manhattan, quickly refused to take control, saying he wanted to carefully review the “unusual situation.” However, he has shown that he will make a decision soon, acknowledging Adams’ pending reelection campaign and the vast political and legal implications that will mark the date of his trial on April 21.
What you need to know
During an extraordinary hearing on Wednesday, the Justice Department deputy commander demanded that a judge dismiss a corruption charge against Mayor Eric Adams, leading the nation’s biggest city leader – in danger. Freedom and the political future – “I’m not committed. Crime.”
After commissioning for more than an hour, Dale E. Ho, a federal judge in Manhattan, quickly refused to take control, saying he wanted to carefully review the “unusual situation.” However, acknowledging the vast political and legal implications, including Adams’ pending reelection campaign, looming the trial date on April 21, he indicated he would soon make a decision.
The mayor appeared cheerfully, moving from his past appearance. A leisurely walk into the courtroom, he accepted a member of the black clergy sitting in the front row.
“I’m not going to shoot it on the bench from the waist here,” Ho said. But he said, “It’s not an interest for anyone to have this drag on.”
The Justice Department’s request was filed by Washington officials over the objections of federal prosecutors in Manhattan — Adams’ ability to govern and sacrifice his cooperation in the ongoing immigration crackdown on the Trump administration. It was based on the argument that it was hindering the
Solely on the prosecutor’s table, U.S. Attorney General Emil Bove told Ho that the Department of Justice is exercising “prosecutor’s discretion” and that accepting the request is the judge’s only option. Adams’ attorney, Alex Spiro, said there has never been a court of appeals appointed to judges who rejected unopposed claims to dismiss the criminal case.
The mayor appeared cheerfully, moving from his past appearance. A leisurely walk into the courtroom, he accepted a member of the Black Clergy sitting in the front row.
Bove urged Ho to ignore outside voices. This comes with his demand to drop the lawsuit, including the voices of prosecutors who resigned in protest. Bove said the judge should reject such claims that there was a “Quid Pro Quo” between Adams and the Department of Justice.
“I won’t admit it. Even if you say there’s a problem with this move, I don’t think it’s right,” Bove added.
Questioned under oath by Ho, Adams testified that there was no “other agreement” between himself and the government. Ho also questioned Adams about the Justice Department’s filing claims that would allow prosecutors to revive the charges against him at a later date.
“I’ve not committed a crime,” Adams said. “I’m not afraid of that.”
Ho was scheduled for a hearing after three Trump administration lawyers, including Bove, made a request for fire on Friday. Top federal prosecutors in Manhattan resigned after rejecting an order seeking fire.
Adams accused him of not committing any crime last September and has revealed his illegal campaign contributions and gorgeous travel perks from Turkish officials and business leaders who are trying to buy Adams’ influence while president of Brooklyn Autonomous Region. I accepted. He faces multiple challengers in the Democratic primary in June.
Bove said the request to withdraw the corruption charges against the mayor stem from “a simple exercise at the discretion of the prosecutor’s law” through Trump’s executive order on the weaponization of the judicial system and General Pam Bondy’s memorandum.
Bove said he believes that the request to withdraw the charges “will not be translated in this courtroom,” when tied to Trump’s orders and Bondi’s conclusions.
Bove also said he believes “this prosecution’s continuity is obstructing both national security and immigration enforcement initiatives being implemented by the administrative department.”
It is Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul who is closely watching the judicial proceedings. Kathy Hochul is considering whether to remove Adams from his office amid concerns that he has signed a contract to file a lawsuit in exchange for the mayor’s political loyalty.
Earlier last week, Bove told New York prosecutors to drop the charges because the prosecutors “overly restricts Mayor Adams’ ability to devote full attention and resources to illegal immigration and violent crimes.” Bove said the charges could be revived after the mayoral election in November.
Two days later, then Interm U.S. Attorney Daniel Sasson told Bondy in a letter that he would dismiss the charges in return for Adams’ support in enforcing federal immigration law. Action or other forms of misconduct. ”
“The dismissal of the charges will be all three for reasons other than affecting the mayor’s decision-making,” said Sasson, a Republican. She said it amounted to a “Quid Pro Quo” deal, revealing that prosecutors were trying to inflict additional judicial charges against Adams.
Bove accepted Sussone’s resignation and accused him of “pursuing a politically motivated prosecution despite explicit instructions to dismiss the case.” He told her that the other two prosecutors assigned to the case have been suspended on their paychecks and that the investigation would decide whether they would continue their work.
One prosecutor, Hagan Scotten, wrote in his resignation letter saying he left the next day and supported Sasson’s actions. Scotter told Bove that he needed a “fool” or “co-sick” to meet his request to drop Bove’s accusations.
Overall, seven prosecutors, including five high-ranking prosecutors from the Department of Justice, had resigned by Friday.
Shortly before Wednesday’s hearing, Bondy’s Chief of Staff Chad Misell said on 10 days after Bob reached a decision to file a charge “reaching without assessing the strength of the law.” I cited the discussion and took it to social media to protect the department’s termination request. Evidence or legal theory on which the case is based.”
In a series of posts on X, Mizzel said in Adams’ case that prosecutors’ “spread reading” about public corruption laws could stand before the US Supreme Court, which overturns the famous white convictions. He claimed it was low. Collar defendant.
“The lawsuit against Mayor Adams was one of the long history of past DOJ actions that represented a serious mistake in judgment,” writes Misell.
Sasson and her colleagues found support for their position from the small army of former prosecutors.
On Friday, seven former U.S. lawyers from Manhattan, including James Comey, Jeffrey S. Berman and Mary Joe White, issued a statement celebrating Sasson’s “commitment to the integrity and the rule of law.”
On Monday, three former U.S. lawyers in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut ordered that the Department of Justice acts inappropriately or that all evidence be made available to state and local prosecutors. , submitted documents to HO to propose appoint a special prosecutor.
Former Watergate prosecutors will reject the government’s request and consider assigning a special advisor to the judge to explore legal issues and ultimately appoint an independent special prosecutor. I submitted my papers separately, asking me to consider trying them out.
