![A letter from House Democrats on Justice Department officials 3 Page 4/6](https://static01.nyt.com/newsgraphics/documenttools/a751192c9004dae3/4/output-4.png)
Furthermore, rules 1.7 of the DC BAR’s rules of professional conduct prohibiting lawyers from representing clients if the representative is directly at a disadvantage to another client. Representatives of both the US and Padilla, Martin’s parties were directly at a disadvantage to his client, the US. His actions are also likely to be subject to Rule 1.11, which limits ethical conflicts among lawyers moving between government and private practices. This rule expressly prohibits counsel from accepting other employment in connection with issues similar to or “substantially related” to issues in which he or she has personally and substantially participated in while serving as a civil servant or employee. I’m doing it. 12 Such a brave conflict of interest should be a case study of law school ethics courses. In fact, Martin is currently facing DC Barr’s complaints about his actions against his client in denial of these charges. 13What’s worse, Martin not only represented those who participated in the January 6th rebellion, but also witnessed both the organizers, participants and the “Stop the Theft” Larry himself. His own concurrent entry at ¹4X made him personally attend Riot, who turned to rally. 15 Furthermore, on June 8, 2021, Martin posted to X, “The Sorcerer Keeper is all us.” Fair restrictions on five CFR §2635.502 by ju-government of inflammatory conspiracy among other crimes before President Trump forgives them on his first 16th, Martin has been in the midst of January You should force yourself to reject yourself. As a witness and participant in the January 6 protest, he expressed substantial bias in his actions and public support for the convicted offenders on January 6. As mentioned earlier, not only did Mr. Martin investigate the entire attack on January 6th, but the conduct of the accused he represented is also a further violation of the DC Barr rules of professional conduct. This explicitly prohibits lawyers from serving as advocates in trials where they are likely to be “necessary witnesses” (with certain exceptions in this case that do not apply). 18 In fact, 12 DC Prof’l Conduct rules, R. 1.11 (2025), https://www.dcbar.org/for-lawyers/legal-ethics/rules-of- professional-conduct/client-lawyer-relations/sequential government and employment. 13 65 Project, Barr’s Complaint to Edward Martin (February 6, 2025), https://the65project.com/bar-complaint-against-edward-martin/. 14 Kyle Cheney, Ed Martin Jr., defendant crusades on January 6th, now overseeing their pardons, politics (January 29th, 2025, 1pm), https://www.politico. com/news/2025/ 01/29/ed-martin-jr-jan-6-defendants-00201269. 15 Ed Martin (@eagleedmartin), x (January 6, 2021, 2:53 PM), https://x.com/egleedmartin/status/13469077779492143106. 16 Kyle Cheney (@kylecheney), X (January 29th, January 1st, 2021), https://x.com/kyledcheney/status/1884665336483426717. 17 Spencer S. HSU & Tom Jackman, DCUS Attorney Fire January 6th Prosecutor, New Probe, Wash Post (January 31, 2025), https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/ 2025/01/31/jan6-prosecutors-fired-dc-martin/. 18 3d.C. Professor Rules, R. 3.7 (2025), https://www.dcbar.org/for-lawyers/legal-ethics/rules-of-professional – Conduction/Advocate/Lawyer –